The Mainichi Shimbun erupts
The conventional wisdom on the Japanese media is that the Sankei Shimbun and the Yomiuri Shimbun are conservative newspapers while the Mainichi Shimbun and the Asahi Shimbun are liberal newspapers. When it comes to World War II, there is a wide divergence of opinion between the liberals and the conservatives. At least that's what the conventional wisdom says. Beneath the surface, however, there is much more agreement than is commonly believed.
While on most every day, the Mainichi Shimbun slavishly publishes whatever they think will not offend the West, every now and then, once every blue moon, for whatever reason, the Mainichi Shimbun gets really pissed off and tells the world what they really think.
A year ago they published an editorial called "Japan must find middle road on war responsibility." (mainichi.jp/english/english/perspectives/news/20130429p2a00m0na002000c.html)
“Japan's war in Asia was a war of aggression. At the same time, however, Japan shattered the European colonial empires in Southeast Asia. This is a balanced view of the war. Both wars of aggression and colonial rule are indefensible, and neither was the exclusive specialty of militarist Japan.”
“How many nations had the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and other European states colonized from the 16th century onward? There is no need to count up the misdeeds of our friends, but I'd like people to remember their history.”
One would have thought such an argument would more likely come from the Yomiuri Shimbun. Ironically, based on what I've seen, the Yomiuri Shimbun is much more cowardly and much more reticent to publish articles that might offend the West.
The Nakano School
The decision to create the Nakano School was made in 1937. (Kindle Location 65 of The Shadow Warriors of Nakano) The school opened its doors a year later in 1938.
The first batch of students “graduated in the summer of 1939.” (Kindle Location 427 of The Shadow Warriors of Nakano)
They were told “that a single spy was more valuable than a division of soldiers.” (Kindle Locations 363 of The Shadow Warriors of Nakano)
“His teachers had also drilled into him the lessons of sacrifice underpinning ‘spiritual education’ at the school.” (Kindle Locations 408 of The Shadow Warriors of Nakano)
They were given a “sense that they were elite defenders of the empire.” (Kindle Location 409 of The Shadow Warriors of Nakano)
One last meeting
Before World War II began, Japan sent a special envoy, Saburo Kurusu, to America to negotiate. While there, he had a conversation with Frederick Moore, an American who had been intimately involved in U.S. - Japan relations for decades.
“I know what governments say and I know what they do,” said Kurusu. “I was for a long time, as you know, in charge of commercial relations in the Foreign Office, and I know from experience how reluctant other countries were to deal fairly with us.”
“I know, too, and I suppose the United States was one of the worst,” said Moore.
“I can’t say your country was the worst,” replied Kurusu. “The British were the worst.”
Some things never change.
Moore told Kurusu that he hoped World War II would teach everyone a lesson.
Kurusu just shook his head in disbelief.
Less than an hour after the attack on Pearl Harbor began, the Japanese government sent out a secret message which declared that there was now a crisis in relations with Britain. (http://ajw.asahi.com/article/behind_news/social_affairs/AJ201304140030)
You are probably thinking that Japan should have sent out the message which said there was a crisis with America. But you would be mistaken. Though World War II did result in the dissolution of the Japanese Empire, that was a short term setback for Japan. For America, the war resulted in a dramatic increase in power. By contrast, the war was devastating for the British. The war resulted in the destruction of the British Empire. Britain has been in decline ever since.
Japan wanted the war, in part, because Japan wanted to bring an end to their own militarism which was a huge waste of resources. But Japan still wanted to remove European influence from East Asia.
“For two or more generations the goal of the Japanese militarists had been set,” said Moore. “One by one, as the opportunities offered, they planned to drive the Western Powers out of their special lodgments on the Western Pacific. To them it seemed logical that, as Japanese were kept out of the United States, Canada and Australia, Britons and Americans should be made to leave East Asia.”
After the war, Europe was unable to reestablish its influence in East Asia because Japan fomented insurgencies in all their former colonies. In the coming days I will offer more evidence which supports this conclusion.
On the day Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, the Japanese ambassador handed a final note to the U.S. Secretary of State. The note included the following section:
“It is a fact of history that the countries of East Asia for the past hundred years or more have been compelled to observe the status quo under the Anglo-American policy of imperialistic exploitation and to sacrifice themselves to the prosperity of the two nations. The Japanese Government cannot tolerate the perpetuation of such a situation since it directly runs counter to Japan's fundamental policy to enable all nations to enjoy each its proper place in the world.”
Peta
Before World War II, Indonesia was a Dutch colony known as the Dutch East Indies. After Pearl Harbor, the Japanese military quickly deposed the Dutch and began their occupation of Indonesia at the beginning of March 1942. (Page 75 of Japanese-Trained Armies in Southeast Asia) From that point forward, Japan began to create an army which eventually became known as the Pembela Tanah Air, or PETA. PETA was the creation of a Japanese intelligence agency, the Beppan. (Page 91 of Japanese-Trained Armies in Southeast Asia)
The training began at youth centers throughout Java, either in the spring or the summer of 1942. Recruits were “given para-military training and indoctrination” (Page 104 of Japanese-Trained Armies in Southeast Asia) Recruits were trained for six months. After finishing that, some of them were selected to go to the Tanggerang Center for further training. The first batch of recruits for the Tanggerang Center began their training in January 1943. (Page 104 of Japanese-Trained Armies in Southeast Asia)
Although activities related to the creation of PETA began almost immediately after the Japanese captured Indonesia, the formal announcement of the creation of PETA took place much later, on October 3, 1943. (Page 98 of Japanese-Trained Armies in Southeast Asia) The Tanggerang Center was closed. The officials who worked there were transferred to a new facility, the Officer Training Center, which opened its doors at the end of 1943. The best students from Tanggerang were underwent officer training at this new facility. (Page 105 of Japanese-Trained Armies in Southeast Asia) Recruits at this facility then underwent another three months of training. Upon completion of their training, the graduates had to go out and recruit and training their own recruits. (Page 107 of Japanese-Trained Armies in Southeast Asia)
In February 1944, the graduates, accompanied by Japanese officers, moved to Bali to train another three battalions. (Page 108 of Japanese-Trained Armies in Southeast Asia) Officer training was completed in June. By the time the war had ended, Peta had 34,500 soldiers. (Page 109 of Japanese-Trained Armies in Southeast Asia)
Training for staff officers began in January 1944. (Page 110 of Japanese-Trained Armies in Southeast Asia)
Spiritual training
Chudancho training
“The training was tough but effective, according to those who went through the program. A day’s training lasted all day, with only six hours of sleep. Long all-day marches were followed by running, in turn followed by jumping into a cold pool. The program was not elaborate technically and did not include study of military strategy and science. It was designed to teach Indonesians to endure hardship with a spirit of sacrifice and self-reliance. The emphasis on spirit, seishin (semangat in Indonesian), was universally noted by all interviewees trained here as in other Japanese programs in Southeast Asia, whether military or civilian. Training was designed to produce physical courage and stamina.” (Page 106 of Japanese-Trained Armies in Southeast Asia)
“Two basic assumptions underlay Japanese military training programs, both in the Japanese Army and in the armies in Southeast Asia. One was that spirit, seishin, is more important than any technological advantage in military weaponry. The other was that self-discipline must be absolute, precluding any conflict with other values.” (Page 170 of Japanese-Trained Armies in Southeast Asia)
“The emphasis on spirit was designed to encourage heroism in battle when all technical military advantages might lie with the enemy. The discipline endurance and confidence thereby instilled were in all cases transferred to nascent armies in post-war Southeast Asia. In evaluation the legacy of Japanese training, the special emphasis on inculcating a fighting spirit, self-reliance and self-discipline cannot be overemphasized. The Japanese imparted to their Southeast Asian trainees the assumption that the elan of the warrior was far superior to his technical expertise and would enable him to overcome any obstacle. Detection of the seeds of this spirit among applicants for Japanese training programs, and fostering the spirit among trainees were mentioned by many Southeast Asians as the foremost feature of Japanese education, both military and civilian.” (Page 170 to 171 of Japanese-Trained Armies in Southeast Asia)
“Many Southeast Asians note today that they still feel the effects of this spiritual training, though the impact of the technical education was more ephemeral.” (Page 171 of Japanese-Trained Armies in Southeast Asia)
The occupation “created a new class of elites who competed for influence and prestige with traditional elites. The most important of these emerging elites was without doubt the new military leadership reared by the Japanese army commands. While colonial armies had as a rule been drawn from ethnic minorities and officered by Westerners, the Japanese recruited and trained entire armies and officers' corps from among the major ethnic groups in Southeast Asia.” (Page 325 of Japan Examined)
Other changes in Indonesia
The Japanese “appointed indigenous people to administrative posts to replace Europeans.” (Page 328 of Japan Examined)
“Though their participation in central and local administrations was limited, they acquired skills of administering government. This knowledge proved useful in postindependence years.” (Page 328 of Japan Examined)
“Indonesia is a multilingual nation consisting of more than three thousand islands sprawling over three thousand square miles. Before the war there was no common language except Dutch, the lingua franca of the educated. The mass of the populace spoke in dialects and the people had no self-identity as Indonesians. During the Japanese interregnum, Indonesian became the national language due to Japanese encouragement and a ban on Dutch.” (Page 329 of Japan Examined)
Sukarno “could not have united the nation in postwar years so effectively without Japan's language policy.” (Page 329 of Japan Examined)
Had Japan wanted to annex Indonesia, they would have made Japanese the official language of Indonesia during the occupation.
The Indian National Army
“The India project was part of a secret war which would be fought chiefly with the weapons of propaganda and espionage. Under Iwakuro Japanese-sponsored intelligence schools burgeoned throughout Southeast Asia, training Indians for infiltration behind enemy lines.” (Kindle Locations 4958-4960 from The Indian National Army and Japan)
“Japan’s aim in aiding the INA remained to foster anti-British sentiment. All Japanese policy decisions regarding the INA pointed toward this goal. The major Japanese thrust throughout the war was to encourage proliferation of Indian intelligence activities throughout Southeast Asia. Even during the Imphal campaign and the engagements in Burma, the Japanese Army was reluctant to see the INA evolve into a large fighting force.” (Kindle Locations 4999-5002 from The Indian National Army and Japan)
Fujiwara spoke before 45,000 Indian POWs. (Kindle Location 735 from The Shadow Warriors of Nakano)
He declared “that Japan was waging its war in order to liberate Asia from Western colonialism. He assured his audience that Japan had no designs on India.” (Kindle Locations 737 from The Shadow Warriors of Nakano)
The revolution begins
In all, Japan trained 353,000 soldiers in Southeast Asia. (Page 325 of Japan Examined)
“All the self-confidence, military training, and political expertise which had been acquired in the Japanese interregnum were now mobilized against attempts at reassertion of Western colonial rule. Under Japanese occupation nationalism and aspirations for independence had been stimulated to a point of no return.” (Page 183 of Japanese-Trained Armies in Southeast Asia)
“Southeast Asians emerged from the war equipped with military arms and training, political and organizational experience and skills, and a firm and irrevocable ideological commitment to independence.” (Page 183 of Japanese-Trained Armies in Southeast Asia)
“They would lead their awakened peoples against a return to colonial servitude,” said Stephen Mercado. “Throughout Asia, the war had fanned the embers of nationalism into unquenchable fires.” (Kindle Location 50 from The Shadow Warriors of Nakano)
“In Atjeh State, for example, members of Pusa killed many of the uleebalang, the aristocratic class through whom the Dutch had ruled the States of Atjeh.” (Page 133 of Japanese-Trained Armies in Southeast Asia)
The New York Times
A few months after the official end to World War II, the New York Times published perhaps the most extraordinary editorial in their 163 years of existence. Despite the official surrender of the Japanese military on August 15, the war did not end on that day, a fact for which the Times blamed Japan. There is “cumulative evidence,” they declared, “that at least part of the trouble in the Orient is being caused by Japanese treachery and by violation of the surrender terms.”
Under the terms of their surrender, Japan was to hand over all their “military equipment and civil property.”
“But it is now confirmed that, in violation of these terms and the command of their own Emperor, the local Japanese commanders have been turning over arms and equipment to the Indonesian and Indo-Chinese revolutionaries and to the Chinese Communists,” said the Times. “They have planted agents of unrest throughout the Far East, trained in special Japanese treason schools to propagate in underground warfare the same aims Japan sought to gain in the war she lost. They are furnishing military leadership and even men to native groups fighting the Allies. And in the Indies they even created, five days after their surrender, an ‘Indonesian Republic.’”
“But the most explosive situation exists in China, where the end of the war and Japanese arms turned over to them have inspired in the Chinese Communists even greater resistance to the recognized Government of their country than they displayed in the past. The Communists are not only delaying the disarmament and dissolution of the Japanese armies on Chinese soil but are also raising the specter of civil war, which could set all Asia aflame again.”
A few months later, the Times published another article in which they accused Japan of leaving behind in Asia “a legacy of hate and of ideas that promise to keep East Asia in a ferment for decades, perhaps a century.”
“Even more important than the physical damage done by the soldiers of the Emperor are the ideas that were planted,” said the Times. “The Japanese dropped an atomic bomb of nationalism in a stagnant pool of a billion Asiatics.”
“It is a bomb whose chain reaction promises to be as obliterative of the old order as was the uranium fission which leveled Hiroshima and Nagasaki”
In this article, the Times included a history of European colonialism in Asia, including how they managed to subjugate the people who lived there. Before the Europeans arrived, the region was full of “ancient tribes and kingdoms that warred on each other, had no common language, and until recently had little communication with each other.”
“It was isolationism and factionalism that the colonial powers took advantage of, and encouraged,” said the Times. “The policy of ‘Divide and Rule’ that Hitler adopted in Europe was practiced everywhere in the Far Eastern colonies. Colonial troops from one section of a country were seldom brigaded together. In suppressing internal disorders, native troops were never used in their own province, always in some distant part of the country. Ancient tribal customs that would distinguish one area from another were encouraged.”
“Conflicting religions also were encouraged.”
“When the Japanese came they made three important changes. First, they exploded the myth of military and social invulnerability of the ‘pukkah sahibs’ and ‘tuan besars.’ They overwhelmed their military forces in short order and then subjected white prisoners to every form of indignity and encouraged former servants of the white man to do likewise.”
“Second, they inaugurated a propaganda campaign that has been eagerly continued by nationalist leaders. Knowing the people could not read, the Japanese set up radio stations and established outdoor radio receiving units in practically every village. Thus millions who could not be reached through the eye were reached through the ear.”
“That the colonial peoples of the Far East intend to have their freedom, and that they eventually will win it, there is little doubt. Their numbers are many times those of the white man. And for the first time in their history-thanks largely to the Japanese-they have modern arms with which to fight. None of them is so well armed as are the forces of the colonial powers, but they make up in numbers and in fanatical fervor what they lack in modern artillery and planes. And they are united. A few bands of irregulars-which is how some colonial diehards describe the revolutionary armies-could not paralyze the economy of half of Asia unless they had the support of the majority of the people.”
“Whatever the outcome of these present days of turmoil and transition, the Far East in all probability will never again be the happy hunting ground of European imperialists and the predatory white business man.”
References:
The New York Times accuses Japan of violating the terms of surrender and fomenting revolution in Asia:
timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1945/11/17/88312809.html
The other articles published by the New York Times, which includes a history of European colonialism in the Far East and how Japan stirred the people of the region to revolution:
query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=990CE3DF133EEE3BBC4153DFB466838C659EDE
Indonesia
“Confusion and terror reign and, outside protected areas, no life is safe” regardless of which flag they wave. The Dutch flag “offers more menace than protection.” (timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1945/11/18/109348256.html)
“The Indonesians admit they cannot guarantee tranquillity anywhere so long as the hated Dutch are in evidence,” wrote the New York Times on November 17.
“the Dutch have given them nothing for the enormous wealth in gasoline and tropical products they have taken from the country-nothing except repressive taxation, clumsy administration, tyrannous and bureaucratic control of commerce and industry and neglected education.”
“The Dutch attribute the institution of the republic directly to Japan, but they admit they cannot hope to restore the old order by force of arms. A new phase has begun. The Indonesians are consumed by a longing for liberty and independence. They won’t be stopped.”
“Rigid restrictions were placed on Japanese troops said by the British to have helped to instigate the Indonesian violence,” said the New York Times. (timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1946/02/23/93056907.html)
Vietnam
On August 25, 1945, Bao Dai abdicated and Japan transferred all power to the Viet Minh. (Page 133 of Tradition, Revolution, and Market Economy in a North Vietnamese Village) On September 2, 1945, the same day that Japan signed the formal instrument of surrender, Ho Chi Minh read the Declaration of Independence for the Democratic Republic of Vietnam. (www.unc.edu/courses/2009fall/hist/140/006/Documents/VietnameseDocs.pdf)
“for more than eighty years, the French imperialists, abusing the standard of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, have violated our Fatherland and oppressed our fellow-citizens,” he said.
“they have drowned our uprisings in rivers of blood.”
“They have robbed us of our rice fields, our mines, our forests, and our raw materials.”
“Our people have broken the chains which for nearly a century have fettered them and have won independence for the Fatherland.”
“we, members of the Provisional Government, representing the whole Vietnamese people, declare that from now on we break off all relations of a colonial character with France; we repeal all the international obligation that France has so far subscribed to on behalf of Vietnam and we abolish all the special rights the French have unlawfully acquired in our Fatherland.”
“The whole Vietnamese people, animated by a common purpose, are determined to fight to the bitter end against any attempt by the French colonialists to reconquer their country.”
“we, members of the Provisional Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, solemnly declare to the world that Vietnam has the right to be a free and independent country”
“The entire Vietnamese people are determined to mobilise all their physical and mental strength, to sacrifice their lives and property in order to safeguard their independence and liberty.”
In Vietnam, “the Japanese armed 60,000 Annamites in Saigon with machine-guns, rifles, revolvers, daggers and bamboo clubs and encouraged them to strike for independence from French rule.” (query.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=F20F1FFE3B55177A93CBA91782D85F418485F9)
“the French regarded the trouble as ‘all Jap-inspired.’” (timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1945/09/26/issue.html)
When the war ended, “the Japanese secret police of more than 1,000 members … switched their uniforms for civilian clothing and, as Indo-Chinese ‘merchants’ were aiding the Annemese in their rebellion against restoration of French rule.” (query.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=F00A15FF3D5E1B7B93C0A9178BD95F418485F9)
Freedom for India
The British tried members of the INA on November 5. (Kindle Location 4711 from The Indian National Army and Japan)
On trial were three members of the INA, one of which was Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon. (Kindle Location 4725 from The Indian National Army and Japan) Fujiwara was called to testify at their trial. He asked for, and was given, some potassium cyanide for which he intended on using to kill himself. But at the last moment, he decided against consuming the poison. (Kindle Location 4829 from The Indian National Army and Japan) Turned out to be a good decision.
“Will the trial go well?” he asked. (Kindle Location 4847 from The Indian National Army and Japan)
“Don’t worry,” said Dhillon. “India will gain independence within a year. If they punish any one of us no Englishman will leave India alive.” (Kindle Locations 4847 from The Indian National Army and Japan)
These remarks were spoken right in front of a British officer, who upon hearing those words, said nothing. That the Dhillon felt comfortable telling Fujiwara this information in front of the British indicates that the outcome of the trial, and the future of India, had already been decided. Indeed India was granted independence, though the timetable was slightly more drawn out. But only slightly. India was granted independence on August 15, 1947, about eight months after the predicted deadline.
The vice-minister for foreign affairs, Matsumoto, at the trial, said Japan supported the INA “to help India achieve independence, which was … one of Japan’s war aims.” (Kindle Location 4795 from The Indian National Army and Japan)
Hundreds of thousands of Indians protested the trials. (Kindle Location 4871 from The Indian National Army and Japan)
The protests continued to grow after the trial. The Indian Navy revolted against the British.
“If there were any Englishmen who still doubted the questionable loyalty of the Indian services, they were now convinced.” (Kindle Locations 4883 from The Indian National Army and Japan)
Full tide
“Instead of ebbing, post-war ferment in the Far East still rises toward full tide. In India, Burma, Indo-China and China it is boiling over. It stirs half the population of the earth.” (timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1946/12/22/95801057.html)
The French continue to fight the Viet Minh.
“But it is a hopeless war.”
“All nations, East and West, recognize that the colonial era in Asia is over forever.”
“The world regards this mounting Asiatic ferment with somber premonition.”
January 1949 in Vietnam
“the French were fighting not only the Viet-Minh rebels but also an estimated 10,000 Japanese soldiers left behind after the occupation.” (timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1949/01/03/84184670.html)
The final battle for independence in Indonesia
The Japanese military continued to fight alongside the Indonesians until the very end. Three years after Japan’s official surrender, towards the end of 1948, “two of the four Dutch planes lost in the fighting had been shot down by ‘an anti-aircraft battery manned by about thirty Japanese.’” (query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9D01EED7123FEE32A2575AC2A9649D946993D6CF)
“The latest Dutch ‘police action’ in Java and Sumatra, besides darkening the outlook for a durable settlement here, appears to have done perhaps irreparable damage to the stability of all Asian colonial areas. In addition, it has resulted in an immediate strengthening of the Communist line, not only here internationally.” (timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1949/01/10/85322894.html)
“Among colonials themselves-the British in Malaya and the Dutch in Indonesia-there is much huffing and puffing and whistling in the dark that seems almost unreal to anyone who has been in slight contact with the boiling cauldrons of non-white opinion in Southeast Asia.”